 | Anon. Expanding Systems Management to the Enterprise: Issues and Strategies. Anon
(Special Advertising Supplement). 1992. S2-S12 Key-words- A1 System definition
Ab-stract- If your organization is is typical, you are being asked to take greater
control of a wide variety of information processing resources - PCs, workstations,
midranges and networks. Why? Because corporate IS has already proven its ability to manage
complex technologies efficiently, effectively and with an eye to corporate profitability.
Now that heterogeneous departmental systems have proliferated, your enterprise is relying
upon you to bridge these isolated pockets of automation, to make sense of these disparate
technologies and fulfill the promise of computer-based information sharing
|
 | Anon. Managing Performance Across the Enterprise. Anon (Advertising Supplement). 1992.
s2 - s8 Key-words- Performance Measurement
Ab-stract- These days, you're probably being asked to service more and more end users
on an expanding variety of systems and network platforms and these end users are demanding
better response time and availability. And this can be quite a challenge, since your
budget is expected now to stretch beyond the glass house and assimilate isolated workgroup
and departmental systems.
|
 | R. C. Barker. Financial Performance Measurement: Not a Total Solution. Management
Decision. 1995. 31-39 Key-words- pm benchmark f/nf
Ab-stract- A framework for measuring the value-adding capability of an entire
manufacturing chain is described. The framework provides a means of benchmarking
organizational performance irrespective of market-related profit margin. The method of
analysis provides a measure of existing value-adding capability as well as guidance for
investment, constraint removal and measurement of the new state. The measure of untapped
potential available in an organization allows for benchmarking against world-class
standards. The methods could also be used to aid company share evaluation since the
relative improvement potential can be measured as intercompany comparisons become
available. Graphs, References
|
 | K. Burden. Buyer's scorecard: Pilot's Lightship tops satisfaction ratings.
Computerworld. 1993. 80 Key-words-
Ab-stract- Presents a comparison review between executive information systems from
Comshare Inc. and Pilot Software Inc. Reports that Pilot's Lightship ($NA) was preferred
by users in a Computerworld survey over Comshare's Commander/EIS ($NA). Says Lightship is
a Windows-based program and scored higher than Commander/EIS in six of seven of the most
highly-rated categories. Says Lightship was most highly rated in hot spot and drilldown
capabilities, which provide greater programmability with new mathematical, string and
relational functions. Cited Lightship's strength as its user friendliness and flexible
customization. Its biggest weakness was slow performance. Notes that Commander scored
highest in graphical reporting, and also was lauded for its flexible graphical user
interface. However, it was criticized for weak documentation. Lightship rated a 6.9 out of
ten in the survey, Commander a 6.5. Includes four graphs.
|
 | D. E. a. B. Carter, Barbara S. Concurrent Engineering: The Product Development
Environment for the 1990s. 1992 Key-words- Concurrent Engineering, Product Development,
Automation, Time to Market.
Ab-stract- Company must transform the five forces of change: technology, tools, tasks,
talent, and time into well-managed resources for product development. The concurrent
eingineering environment is defined in terms of four key dimensions: organization,
communication infrastructure, requirements, and product development. Furthermore a plan is
fien for automation as will as an assessment tool to determine the right concurrent
engineering approach to a specific company.
|
 | S. Caselli, C. Papaconstantinou, K. Doty and S. Navathe. A Structure-function-control
Paradigm for Knowledge-based Modeling and Design of Manufacturing Workcells. Journal of
Intelligent Manufacturing. 1992. 11-30 Key-words- object-oriented views process
activity resource model petri nets
Ab-stract- This paper discusses the integration of structural, functional, and control
knowledge in manufacturing workcell modeling, simulation, and design. After an overview of
applications of semantic and object-oriented data models in the manufacturing domain,
issues relating to the control synthesis for manufacturing workcells are presented. In
particular, a data model encompassing functional and control features, along wiht
application domain structural knowledge is developed. This model assists in explicitly
representing the control aspects of engineering design within an object-oriented database
and supports a task-level functionality driven manufacturing workcell design. Since
manufacturing workcells consist of a number of elements interating in a complex manner,
workcell control design is one of the most difficult steps in the workcell design
procedure. This paper will explore the incorporation of Petri Nets as a basis for
describing application control knowledge within a structure-function-control data model.
|
 | S. J. Childe and P. A. Smart. The use of process modeling in benchmarking. 1995 Key-words-
LEW2 process modelling benchmarking.
Ab-stract- The increasing interest in benchmarking as a tool for achieving radical
improvements in a business' competitive performance has encouraged many companies to
attempt a comparison of their performance to that of others. This has been attempted in
two main ways. Companies who compare their performance to that of their competitors
restrict their potential operating improvements to a position of higher equality with the
competitor, who may have by then moved on. Those companies attempting to look into other
industries to gain real originality may fail if they do not focus on activities which are
directly comparable. This paper looks at the need to identify the correct activities to
study and proposes a modelling technique which can help the company to establish a
baseline for comparison.
|
 | A. Classe. Don't Tinker With It: BPR It! Accountancy. 1993. 64-66 Key-words- BPR
Ab-stract- There is always a better way to run your business. Business Process
Re-engineering can help you identify how to do just that.
|
 | G. J. Colquhoun, R. W. Baines and R. Crossley. A State of the Art Review of IDEF0.
International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing. 1993. 252-264 Key-words- A1
Evaluation Performance Measurement IDEF0 SOA
Ab-stract- The study of manufacturing systems has generated interest in IDEF0, a
structured functional analysis technique for manufacturing. The paper comprises a review
of relevant published literature. Four categories of publications have been identified:
descriptions and reviews of the basic principles of IDEF0; performance evaluation and
comparisons with other techniques; enhancements to the technique; and specific
applications. The paper concludes with a discussion of issues raised as a result of the
review, identifying general agreement that there is a need for such a technique and that
it provides a basis for understanding and analysing manufacturing systems.
|
 | J. G. Covin. Entrepreneurial Versus Conservative Firms: A Comparison of Strategies and
Performance. Journal of Management Studies. 1991. 439-462 Key-words- Business Decision
Strategic Performance Measurement
Ab-stract- This article describes a study of the business strategies and performance
levels of firms with entrepreneurial and conservative strategic postures. Data were
collected from the senior executives of 111 small manufacturing firms. Results indicate
that entrepreneurial firms differ from conservative firms in terms of their growth rates
as well as several financial, operating, and marketing-related variables. The data suggest
that the patterns of strategic behavior associated with high performance are different for
entrepreneurial and conservative firms.
|
 | W. P. Darrow. An International Comparison of Flexible Manufacturing Systems Technology.
Interfaces. 1987. 86-91 Key-words-
Ab-stract-
|
 | P. Duran. Business Process Reengineering Needs IDEF -- Not Structured Analysis. 1993 Key-words-
A1 IDEF.
Ab-stract- The various forms of structured analysis have been used successfully for
several years. They have brought rigor and clarity to software specifications. They do
have shortcomings when applied to business reengineering. This paper presents comparisons
of SA and IDEF in several important areas.
|
 | T. A. Festervand and J. H. Murrey Jr. Competitive intelligence systems for the
independent insurance agent. CPCU Journal. 1993. 31-37 Key-words- eis
Ab-stract- Competitive intelligence systems are systematic process systems created to
help organizations formulate better strategic decisions. Investing in a competitive
intelligence system provide various advantages to the independent agent. These benefits
include providing a vital input into the strategic decision-making process, developing
strategic vision, making comparisons of competing products and services and modifying
strategies to keep in pace with competitors.
|
 | C. Finkelstein. Information Engineering: Strategic Systems Development. 1992 Key-words-
A1 Srategic.
Ab-stract-
|
 | M. S. Fox, M. Gruninger and Y. Zhan. Enterprise Engineering: An Information Systems
Perspective. 1994 Key-words- architecture model view.
Ab-stract- We present a framework for enterprise engineering that encompasses the
formalization of knowledge in an enterprise, its integration into a software tool, and the
visualization of the enterprise. The foundation for the system is the use of generic
ontologies for enterprise modeling.
|
 | T. D. Fry and J. F. Cox. Manufacturing Performance: Local Versus Global Measures.
Production and Inventory Management Journal. 1989. 52-56 Key-words- Perf-meas
Ab-stract- In the United States, manufacturing performance has usually been determined
through the use of various "local" performance criteria. For example, a machine
operator is evaluated on how many parts he produces compared to the standard; a supervisor
is evaluated on his departmental efficiency; and a plant manager is evaluated on his plant
utilization. These types of performance measures are local criteria, since they only
assess the performance of a small part of the manufacturing process within the
organization. Due to the complex organization structures of U.S. industry, most executives
use these measures to assess the overall "global" performance of the
organization. The belief has been that if all personnel and departments are being utilized
efficiently, the overall organization success in maximized. We will briefly describe the
evolution of performance measures and review why productivity improvement programs
frequently fail in the United States. We provide a hypothetical example comparing local
versus global performance and an actual example of conflicting performance measures. We
discuss the various shortcoming and dimensions of performance measurement systems. The use
of local productivity measures to direct the long-term success of the organization must be
eliminated; an organization's success can only be assured by concentrating on global
system-wide performance.
|
 | F. L. Harrison. Advanced Project Management. 1992 Key-words- A15 Project Planning.
Ab-stract-
|
 | J. E. Hodder. Evaluation of Manufacturing Investments: A Comparison of U.S. and Japanese
Practices. Financial Management. 1986. 17-24 Key-words- A4 Justification Evaluation
Strategy
Ab-stract-
|
 | I. Jacobson, M. Ericsson and A. Jacobson. The Object Advantage: Business Process
Reengineering with Object Technology. 1994 Key-words- model oo.
Ab-stract-
|
 | R. O. Knorr. Business Process Redesign: Key to Competitiveness. The Journal of Business
Strategy. 1991. 48-51 Key-words- Process Redesign Reeingineering Cost Drivers
Ab-stract- The re-engineering of business processes must be a basic requirement for
continuous improvement. Focusing on business processes allows one to deal with all of the
relevant issues and provides a framework for applying appropriate tools and techniques. In
addition, no dimension of a firm's strategy, structure, processes, technology, or culture
can be applied effectively in isolation.
|
 | J. N. Luftman, P. R. Lewis and S. H. Oldach. Transforming the Enterprise: The Alignment
of Business and Information Technology Strategies. IBM Systems Journal. 1993. 198-221 Key-words-
BPR IT Tman Strategy
Ab-stract- The strategic use of information technology (IT) is now and has ben a
fundamental issue for every business. In essence, IT can alter the basic nature of an
industry. The effective and efficient utilization of IT requires the alignment of the IT
strategies with the business strategies, something that was not done successfully in the
past with traditional approaches. New methods and approaches are now available. The
strategic alignment framework applies the strategic alignment model to reflect the view
that busienss success depends on the linkage of business strategy, organizational
infrastructure and processes and IT infrastructure and processes. In this paper, we look
at why it may not be sufficient to work on any one of these areas in isolation or to only
harmonize business strategy and inforamtion technology. One reason is that, often, too
much attention is placed on technology, rather than business, management, and
organizational issues. THe objective is to build an organizational structure and set of
busienss processes that reflect the interdependence of enterprise strategy and IT
capabilities. The attention paid to th elinkage of IT to the enterprise can significantly
affect the competitiveness and efficiency of the business. The essential issue is how
information technology can enable the achievement of competitive and strategic advantage
for the enterprise.
|
 | B. Malakooti. A Hierarchical, Multi-Objective Approach To The Analysis, Design, And
Selection of Computer-Integrated Manufacturing Systems. Robotics & Computer-Integrated
Manufacturing. 1989. 83-97 Key-words- A3 A4 Decision Criteria Framework Modeling
Ab-stract- This paper develops a hierarchical, multi-objective programming framework
for decision support, analysis, and design of CIM systems. we demonstrate that each
component of CIM, and CIM as a whole, is associated with conflicting objectives such as
maximizing quality, profit, productivity, and flexibility. Realizing these objectives and
finding appropriate ways to state and resolve their conflicts can play a major role in the
development of CIM systems. We begin with an overview of hierarchical decision making as
related to the time domain, and sime important components of CIM as related to automation.
We then relate manufacturing databases and the structure of decison support systems
considering multiple and conflicting objectives.
|
 | K. Mertins, W. Sussength and R. Jochem. An Object Oriented Method for Integrated
Enterprise Modeling as a Basis for Enterprise Coordination. 1992 Key-words- o-o view.
Ab-stract- Today the modeling of an enterprise is enabled by various methods which are
used for different putproses and views upon th eenteprise. Using an object-oriented
approach the Integrated Enterprise Modeling (IEM) concept will integrate different
modelling views in one consistent manufacturing enterprise model and will provide a
modelling base for construction of an enterprise model from a user's point of view. It
will lead the user from a general CIM architecure given by predefined model structures to
a particular model and architecture ofthe system support in his own manufacturing
enterprse which are the essential tasks towards an enterprise wide and integrative usage
of information technology. Therefore the basic constructs like obkect class structure and
a related process description mehods via the generic activity model will be presented. The
kernal and hte main views of a manufacutring enterprise model will be derived. An example
using the IEM concept for the specific view of CIM planning and introduction will clarify
the main features of hte concept. A comparison with CIMOSA project will be done.
|
 | D. D. Pattison and C. G. Arendt. Activity-Based Costing: It Doesn't Work All the Time.
1994 Key-words- ABC, LEW.
Ab-stract-
|
 | S. Schenkerman. Use and Abuse of Weights in Multiple Objective Decision Support Models.
Decision Sciences. 1991. 369 - 378 Key-words- Measurement Weighting
Ab-stract- This paper examines difficulties with the use of weights to solve multiple
objective decision support models: misunderstanding of the meaning of weights, issues of
commensurability and, most of all, the likely inability of weights alone to isolate the
decision maker's most-preferred point. The e- constraint method is shown to be an
attractive alternative.
|
 | A. M. Schneiderman. Performance Measurements. 1989 Key-words-
Ab-stract-
|
 | D. A. Taylor. Object-Oriented Technology: A Managers Guide. 1991 Key-words-
Ab-stract-
|
 | J. W. Troxler and L. Blank. A Comprehensive Methodology for Manufacturing System
Evaluation and Comparison. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 1989. 175-183 Key-words-
A1 A4 Evaluation Implementation Justification Strategic FMS
Ab-stract- The implementation of manufacturing technology in American industry has
lagged the advances made in recent years. The absence of adequate analysis and
justification methods is a fundamental problem in dealing with investment decisions of
this scope and complexity. But even when the justification barrier is overcome, some
problems remain, as evidenced by the failure of several installed flexible manufacturing
systems to produce at a desired level of output. The preponderance of evidence in the
literature and case studies suggests that justifying and tracking manufacturing systems is
a complex task that requires consideration of many tangible and intangible decision
factors. Previously developed methods usually focus on subsets of factors measured
strictly in monetary-based terms. A comprehensive methodology that systematically
identifies the relevant decision factors and incorporates them in a procedure to indicate
the value of the system to the user is presented. Strategic, tactical, and operational
decision factors are systematically identified, scaled, and aggregated into four measures
of value to the user--namely suitability with respect to strategic planning, capability,
performance, and economic productivity. Features of the method include the analysis of
manufacturing systems from several vantage points which allows problem isolating
comparisons to be made; adaptability to both justification planning studies and
postimplementation tracking analysis; and implicit and explicit risk evaluation.
|
 | S. F. Weber. A Modified Analytic Hierarchy Process for Automated Manufacturing Decision.
Interfaces. 1993. 75 - 84 Key-words- Decision analysis AHP Multiple Criteria
Ab-stract- Decisions on adopting new manufacturing technologies are often biased
because they are based only on those impacts that can be expressed in financial terms.
Multi-criteria decision tools that include nonfinancial impacts avoid this bias. One such
tool, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), has been modified for the manufacturing
environment and incorporated into AutoMan, decision support software for microcomputers.
The modified AHP is used here to decide on the best way to automate a machine shop. The
four steps are: (1) specify criteria and alternatives; (2) weight criteria using pairwise
comparison judgements; (3) rate alternatives with respect to criteria; and (4) compute the
overall weighted score for each alternative.
|
 | R. W. Wright. Toward a Seamless Enterprise. 1994 Key-words- Intelligent Product
Information Sharing COncurrent Engineering ISO 10303.
Ab-stract- In the 90's we are awakening to the realization that to survive in a global
economy, we must change our design and manufacturing policies and practices. We must take
steps to streamline our processes so that we can shorten the cycle time from concept to
production and produce goods that are superior at the lowest possible cost.

Last Modified: Friday, April 09, 1999
Additions, comments, or problems, please let me know at whitman@imfge.twsu.edu
|